AMIA ARCHIVE • View topic

Last edited by DukeDublin on Fri, Sep 02 2016, 19:07 PM, edited 1 time in total.

#StraightOutaAvernus wrote:

I am embarrassed to confess that I am primarily a Mac OS user; and until such time as that can be changed, could anyone put up a visual reference for all the item models that aren't accessible through normal IG crafting means?

Just so I know what's there for requests D:

This took a hell of a lot longer than I expected! You darned Amia players, you, yes you! Enjoy!
Hopefully I didn't cross any modpacks...

Colour LegendCloth 1: Shiny Green
Cloth 2: Pink
Leather 1: Olive Brown
Leather 2: Dark Grey
Metal 1: Silver
Metal 2: Gold

034 has Particles! How Fancy.

________________________________________ 248 has a blue shadowing in-game, be warned!

Last edited by DukeDublin on Fri, Sep 02 2016, 22:41 PM, edited 1 time in total.

I am so sorry for the terrible lines and the unaligned mess it turned out to be. Maybe someone can clean it up (like me >.<)

Male Torso Pieces

Female Torso Pieces

Leg Pieces

Maybe I'll actually edit the weapon pieces.

This would be great to add to the request section. If you wouldn't mind me stealing your work! Your name will be on it ofc~

You're wonderful for this sir!

SamTheGiantSlayer wrote:

This would be great to add to the request section. If you wouldn't mind me stealing your work! Your name will be on it ofc~

Sticky it, steal it, move it, taste it, lick it, drop it. Whatever is good with me!

It is appreciated.

// Posting armors

Armours got added, like a few days ago.

Maybe a dumb question, and I'll probably get lambasted by.. someone for it, but.. why aren't these just in the crafting system and have to be requested?

most of the new chests are to prevent people from just having a code of arms of a city faction on their chest model... the others... No real good reason in my opinion. I believe some scripting would have to be toyed with our craft system to make them available.

no good reason to restrict any of them imho

I agree. City/Faction coat of arms shouldn't be restricted, either. Anyone can forge a coat of arms tabard, after all. Or use one similar with different colors to make a new "coat of arms". And then such instances can be targeted IC'ly! If anyone ever really cared to. xD

Could you please add the numbers of the armor pieces?

Kudark wrote:

Could you please add the numbers of the armor pieces?

Right click image hit view image read adress bar they have numbers

alternatively right click hit save image as you'll see the numbers

TormakSaber wrote:

no good reason to restrict any of them imho

I agree. I think stuff should be all open for crafting imo.

I would love to see these added into the modle for general use. They're very good.

Kudark wrote:

Could you please add the numbers of the armor pieces?

Yeah just give me a while to do it and I'll make everything neat. A recent HDD failure has sent me back and it takes a good chunk of my free time to compile these.

Incase this was lost to time, here you go. A helpful bump for those who may not have seen this.

I should prolly re-post this in the DC request section.

viewtopic.php?f=151&t=84930

Updated, much thanks to DukeDublin again.

If anyone has time and is in the mood to do this with the shields and/or not available to craft in game and wants to earn a couple of DC for it, you're welcome to do so!

Is there actually a reason those models aren't available? The city-specific armour models I can understand wholly, but with the armour smithing system being as useless as it is, it just comes across as pointless locking those things away for DC-requests only.

To my knowledge these simply have never been added to the crafting menu and it mostly comes down to no one having taken the time to adjust the script involved, might be mistaken there though.

Those models aren't new, and the newer hak models were scripted into the crafting menu. It might have still been an oversight, however, which I can understand. But honestly those models aren't anything special, not enough to warrant having to spend 1 DC and trying to catch a DM in game with the time to change it.

Don't get me started on this gemstone of an armour model. http://i588.photobucket.com/albums/ss32 ... so_018.png

Nipples? On armour? Seriously!? If I wanted to see fake 2D nipples I'll just hop over to Sinfar and save myself the 1 DC cost. :lol:

They have great uh, tactical value for uh... something?

I personally would not mind removing the 1 DC cost, honestly.

It would still require a DM though unless we find the time to update the radial, which likely isn't high on the priority list, when we still have a lot of bugs to fix and areas to work on.

The faction and city armors, aswell as helmets that are more a "head" than a helmet I prefer they remain request only with an explanation of what it is/how it was done (for the "head/monster" helmets), though I still do not mind nixing the cost.

Richard_Edmund wrote:

Those models aren't new, and the newer hak models were scripted into the crafting menu. It might have still been an oversight, however, which I can understand. But honestly those models aren't anything special, not enough to warrant having to spend 1 DC and trying to catch a DM in game with the time to change it.

Don't get me started on this gemstone of an armour model. http://i588.photobucket.com/albums/ss32 ... so_018.png

Nipples? On armour? Seriously!? If I wanted to see fake 2D nipples I'll just hop over to Sinfar and save myself the 1 DC cost. :lol:

Not without historical precedents. Compare with: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Greek_bronze_panoply_in_RMO_AvL.JPG

We have similar such models that do a far better job of looking like your linked armour than that thing I linked does.

That thing you linked doesn't even have a belly button.

Custom Item Model Catalog

Who is online