Ok so for rule 2 in my eyes I have a valid RP reason ((will explain if DMs ask))
Rule 3 I need some more in-depth explanation on what does back down even mean... like if I say leave or I kill you, and he does not leave that's a reasonable chance to back down?
Or a case of fix the damage you caused or I kill you..ect?

But Rule 4 IC actions leads to IC consequences does that trump rule 3, as being killed on sight by who ever for said actions would be acceptable? ((unlimited time))


Can assassinations be defined, can I order a hit out on a player and accept it myself and more or less PM, I'm going to kill you.... then kill them? (( repeated ))
Or if not myself can I order a hit on a person and just have it keep being refreshed as per them PM the target/DM and then in turn kill them?



I just wish to do all I can to the limit within the confines of the rules laid out by the DMs that would not be in breach of them.

_________________
================-<Cory ShadowFlame>-================
Risenlord-Shifter(OMG a Non-Dragon Shifter that can hold his own in PvE)

You need a reason, its pretty self explanatory. If you actually have a motive or need to defend yourself you're gold.

You have to give them a chance to back out if it's realistic to do so. "Put your weapons down or we're fighting" ic, followed by an OOC "PVP WARNING" does it. So does telling them to leave or else. Note that if they rest/buff/use a skill/force you to make a save you can just attack them. Make sure you take screens.

Kill on sight has to be mutually agreed to but generally it just means "leave or else we fight ((pvp warning))" when you do meet.

For an assassination you pm a dm and tell them you're putting the hit out, cc or bbc the target. You get up to 2 weeks to carry out the hit iirc. Keep in mind npc rules still apply.

_________________

ANT ALARM

ANT ALARM