That was the past~ Who knows, cut the right deals and Tinn could be back! I mean, I dunno if enough members would resurface to make it possible...

They could come back for sure, they just run the potential of being hunted down, hah.

Also, moar evil houses! YES! Muwahahaha. Bring on the Lolthites! DO IT!

Hunted down by you and what army? Mine?

Well, Uh sure? I mean i want that too... But there's nobody logging online nowadays so why bother? And those that do log in are banned from the settlement.

Tinn will never be back, they're full-on KOS heretics.

IC actions also have OOC consequences. And banning is really one of the worst ways to deal with things because is it ICly logical? Sure, but you're basically cutting off a lot of RP stuff by doing it and a lot of the time the characters and player will go elsewhere. Its kind of shooting yourself in the foot.

I love the UD, its always been my favourite area/group/etc on the server and I would always encourage more players to try making characters to play down there. That said I've seen characters go ban happy down there on several occasions, that or trying to brand a house heretics or make others lose power. All of which are good plans ICly, but I've always been of the mind that if at all possible other options that will keep the players there should be highest priority.

Basically if you can find a reason to keep "heretics" or whoever else around around (as long as they aren't just trying to mess stuff up) then take it, because the UD has rarely had an abundance of players and if you can keep the ones you have you should even if its not ICly optimal.

Basically if you can find a reason to keep "heretics" or whoever else around around (as long as they aren't just trying to mess stuff up) then take it, because the UD has rarely had an abundance of players and if you can keep the ones you have you should even if its not ICly optimal.

Well if Tinnerai is comming back....

I am definitely comming back as Izzton aswell ^^

Basically if you can find a reason to keep "heretics" or whoever else around around (as long as they aren't just trying to mess stuff up) then take it, because the UD has rarely had an abundance of players and if you can keep the ones you have you should even if its not ICly optimal.

This has always been my policy and it has worked incredibly well, for cases where Ada herself has discovered incriminating things. Not just for keeping people involved, but for gaining loyal allies - even characters who don't agree with yours will stick with you if they believe that they have no one else to turn to in order to stay involved

Well, assuming that DMs don't use NPCs in favor of one side or the other (and I assume that was the central issue that needed rectifying in the first place), then there's really no reason to discuss what flies and what doesn't OOC. If you have enough brain and brawn to change drow culture or just secure a place for yourself, you can do or be anything. It doesn't matter what the "right" lore interpretation is as long as NPCs and the setting stay out of PC power struggles. Maybe your Vhaeraunian-Lolthite hybrid house is an abomination in the sight of the majority, but it's up to you to cleave a way through opposition IC.

Action, Begets, Consequence.

ABC. Simple concept. You don't like the negative effects of getting banned?

1) Don't play something you know is going to be banned from a region at outset.

2) Don't do anything to GET you banned if you can help it?

... I remember when you brought Malice back the second time, Numbers. ... and the third. You should get on down there again, Malice or not! That crazy hoe taught Elvis a lot about viper whips, that's for sure.