|
stoneyface
|
Posted: Mon, Mar 15 2010, 8:10 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 14 Jun 2006
|
|
just a curious thought about how people feel about current lifetime status affects quality of service on a pay for play server. since this is now a pay for play server, having an entrenched staff that have more and more animosity aimed at them. maybe a term limit should be implemented to prevent actions. just a thought. nothing more nothing less
_________________ I reject your reality, and substitute my own...
DMT = aim universe at brain, fire
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Yurell
|
Posted: Mon, Mar 15 2010, 8:12 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Location: ANU, behind the coffee mug (+10 GMT)
|
|
Hell no.
And it's not a pay to play server.
_________________ 2009's Second Most Overall Contributing Player
يمكنني استخدام مترجم جوجل
|
|
|
|
 |
|
BrainSplitter
|
Posted: Mon, Mar 15 2010, 8:12 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 06 Apr 2005 Location: Victoria, Australia
|
|
Let's not play this game, XC's, it's Petty.
_________________ Mostly Retired
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Nekhy
|
Posted: Mon, Mar 15 2010, 8:39 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Location: A beautiful fowl house in A'dam
|
|
Amia has never been and never will be pay to play server. If need be, we'll scrape the fees from our own pockets. Of course, it'd be very nice if individuals who play here toss in a few $'s here and there to show that they appreciate the service that's offered. But never pay to play.
I posted this here to clarify the misunderstanding in the first post, mind. I guess the phrasing Mags used could be understood as Amia being pay to play, but that's not the case. Pay to play is quite different from "running on donations".
|
|
|
|
 |